Apex Trader Funding Review 2026: The Giant That Everyone’s Talking About (For Better and Worse)

Bottom Line Up Front: Apex Trader Funding is the 800-pound gorilla of futures prop trading, the 6th most searched prop firm globally with 2.7 million monthly visitors and over $378 million in payouts reported. Founded in 2021 by Darrell Martin in Austin, Texas, Apex has grown explosively by offering account sizes up to $300,000, keeping 100% of your first $25,000 in profits (then 90/10), allowing up to 20 funded accounts simultaneously, and running aggressive discount campaigns (sometimes 80-90% off). With a 4.4-4.8 Trustpilot rating from 15,000+ reviews and an evaluation that can theoretically be passed in 7 trading days, Apex has positioned itself as the accessible option for futures traders who want maximum capital and flexibility. But scratch the surface and you’ll find a controversial operation: monthly fees ranging from $137-677, a trailing drawdown that kills most evaluation attempts, the infamous “30% rules” (both consistency AND negative P&L), frequent complaints about payout denials and rule changes, and a business model built on evaluation fees rather than trader success. Is Apex the best prop firm in futures, or a cleverly marketed evaluation mill? The truth is somewhere in the middle, and knowing which side you’ll land on depends entirely on whether you can navigate their labyrinth of rules.

My Rating: 3.8/5 Stars

What Is Apex Trader Funding, Really?

Let’s start with context: Apex Trader Funding launched in 2021, which makes it a relative newcomer compared to TopStep (2012) but older than MyFundedFutures (2023) or DayTraders.com (2023). Founder Darrell Martin built Apex with a simple value proposition: give traders access to large capital ($25K-$300K accounts), make the evaluation passable (one-step challenge, 7-day minimum), and take a reasonable profit cut (100% of first $25K, then 90/10).

That formula worked spectacularly, at least for Apex’s growth. The firm now ranks:

• 6th globally in prop firm searches (135,000 monthly)
• 5th in website traffic (2.7 million monthly visitors as of March 2025)
• 15,000+ Trustpilot reviews (4.4-4.8 rating depending on source)
• $378 million+ in reported payouts (as of January 2025)

Those numbers make Apex one of the largest futures prop firms by volume, rivaling or exceeding TopStep and Earn2Trade in sheer market share.

But here’s what the marketing doesn’t emphasize: Apex’s business model depends on evaluation volume, not trader success. Like most prop firms, the real revenue comes from traders buying evaluations, failing (most do), and either giving up or paying $80-100 reset fees to try again. The funded traders who actually get payouts are a small minority, profitable enough to generate marketing testimonials, but not so numerous that payout obligations threaten profitability.

How do we know this? Because Apex’s rules are designed to be passable but unforgiving. The trailing drawdown during evaluation kills accounts on reversals. The 30% consistency rule blocks payouts for uneven profit generation. The 30% negative P&L rule limits position sizes and punishes traders who let losses run. And the monthly fees ($137-677) ensure that even funded traders are paying Apex continuously.

This isn’t necessarily nefarious, it’s how prop firms work. But it’s important to understand that Apex isn’t primarily in the business of creating successful traders. They’re in the business of selling evaluations and collecting monthly fees. If you succeed and get paid, fantastic. But the system doesn’t require your success to be profitable.

The Account Structure: Tradovate vs. Rithmic

Apex offers two platform options, and understanding the difference is critical because it impacts pricing, execution quality, and your trading experience.

Tradovate Accounts

Tradovate is a web-based and mobile-friendly futures platform owned by NinjaTrader. It’s accessible, beginner-friendly, and works across devices (web, iOS, Android, Mac, Windows).

Tradovate Account Sizes & Monthly Pricing:

• 25K: $167/month (Profit target: $1,500, Trailing threshold: $1,500, Contract limit: 40 micros)
• 50K: $207/month (Profit target: $3,000, Trailing threshold: $2,500, Contract limit: 80 micros)
• 75K: $257/month (Profit target: $4,000, Trailing threshold: $3,500, Contract limit: 120 micros)
• 100K: $307/month (Profit target: $6,000, Trailing threshold: $5,000, Contract limit: 160 micros)
• 150K: $407/month (Profit target: $8,000, Trailing threshold: $7,000, Contract limit: 200 micros)
• 250K: $577/month (Profit target: $12,500, Trailing threshold: $11,000, Contract limit: 25 minis)
• 300K: $677/month (Profit target: $15,000, Trailing threshold: $13,000, Contract limit: 35 minis)

100K Static Account: $137/month (Profit target: $2,000, Fixed drawdown: $625, Contract limit: 2 minis)

Tradovate accounts include:

• Access to Tradovate platform (web + mobile)
• TradingView integration
• Real-time data fees included ($55 value)
• Evaluation reset fee: $100

Tradovate Funded Account Fee: $105/month (or one-time lifetime fee of $150-360 depending on account size)

Rithmic Accounts

Rithmic is a professional-grade data feed and execution platform favored by serious traders for its low latency and reliability. It’s not standalone, you connect Rithmic through NinjaTrader, Jigsaw, Sierra Chart, or other compatible software.

Rithmic Account Sizes & Monthly Pricing:

• 25K: $147/month (same targets/limits as Tradovate)
• 50K: $187/month
• 75K: $237/month
• 100K: $287/month
• 150K: $387/month
• 250K: $557/month
• 300K: $657/month

Rithmic accounts include:

• Rithmic data feed access
• Free NinjaTrader 8 license ($75 value)
• Real-time data fees included ($55 value)
• Evaluation reset fee: $80

Rithmic Funded Account Fee: $85/month (or one-time lifetime fee of $130-340 depending on account size)

Key Difference: Rithmic is slightly cheaper monthly ($20-40 less depending on account size) and significantly cheaper for resets ($80 vs. $100). If you’re planning to fail evaluations multiple times (statistically likely), Rithmic saves money.

However, Rithmic requires more technical setup (connecting through NinjaTrader or similar platforms) and isn’t as beginner-friendly as Tradovate’s plug-and-play web interface.

WealthCharts (Newer Option)

Apex added WealthCharts Apex, a proprietary platform exclusive to Apex members. It includes:

• 22 exclusive trading scanners with real-time indicators
• 24/7 alerts and AI-driven market scans
• TradingView chart integration
• Real-time data fees included

WealthCharts pricing mirrors Rithmic (similar account costs). It’s positioned as a premium option for traders who want advanced scanning and alerts without third-party subscriptions.

Most traders still use either Tradovate (for ease) or Rithmic (for speed). WealthCharts is growing but remains the minority choice.

The Evaluation: 7 Days to Funded (In Theory)

Apex’s evaluation is a one-step challenge with no time limit. To pass:

1. Hit the profit target (6% for most accounts: 25K = $1,500, 50K = $3,000, etc.)
2. Trade a minimum of 7 trading days
3. Avoid breaching the trailing drawdown
4. Follow all consistency and scaling rules

The Trailing Drawdown: Where Most Traders Die

The trailing drawdown is Apex’s evaluation killer. It works like this:

Your drawdown threshold starts at your initial balance minus the trailing threshold amount. As you make money, the threshold trails up intraday based on your highest intraday balance.

Example (50K account, $2,500 trailing threshold):

• Start: Balance $50,000, threshold $47,500
• Trade up to $51,000: Threshold now $48,500
• Drop to $48,400: You’ve breached, account failed

Even though you’re $1,600 above where you started, you breached because you gave back more than the trailing threshold from your intraday peak. This punishes traders who let winners reverse or who take multiple losses after making profit.

The Static Account Exception: The 100K Static account has a fixed drawdown of $625 that never moves. You can trade up to $110,000, and your drawdown stays at $99,375 forever. This is objectively safer than trailing accounts but comes with trade-offs:

• Smaller profit target ($2,000 vs. $6,000 on a regular 100K)
• Restricted to 2 mini contracts (vs. 160 micros or scaling up on full accounts)
• Monthly fee is same as 25K Tradovate ($137), so you’re paying for simplicity not scale

Most serious traders avoid static accounts because the 2-contract limit is too restrictive once funded.

The Scaling Rule: Trade Half Contracts Until You Unlock

During evaluation, you’re limited to trading half your available contracts until you reach the “trailing threshold unlock point” (EOD balance > initial balance + trailing threshold + $100).

Example (50K account):

• Contract limit: 80 micros (or 8 minis)
• During eval: Can only trade 40 micros (or 4 minis)
• Unlock point: Close a day at $52,600 or higher
• After unlock: Full 80 micros (or 8 minis) available

This scaling rule forces conservative position sizing early, which is smart risk management but frustrating for traders used to full size. It also means you can’t “swing for the fences” on your first few trades, you need gradual profit accumulation.

The 30% Consistency Rule (Evaluation)

While not explicitly enforced during evaluation in 2026 (recent rule changes made this primarily a funded account requirement), Apex historically enforced consistency checks during eval. Always verify current rules before starting, as Apex changes policies frequently.

The principle: No single day’s profit should exceed 30% of total profit. If your profit target is $3,000, no day can generate more than $900 profit.

Why this matters: If you have one huge winning day early ($1,500), you’d need to make at least $5,000 total ($1,500 / 0.30) to stay compliant. This punishes lucky breakouts or perfect news trades unless you continue trading to dilute the percentage.

Minimum Trading Days: 7 Separate Sessions

You must trade on at least 7 different days (doesn’t need to be consecutive). A “trading day” counts if you place at least one trade. Flipping (opening and closing positions rapidly) is allowed as long as you generate $50+ profit on 5 of those days.

No Time Limit: Unlike some firms that give you 30-60 days, Apex’s evaluation never expires. You can take 6 months if needed, waiting for perfect setups. This is genuinely trader-friendly compared to time-pressured evaluations.

Trading Hours & Prohibited Practices

Trading Window: 6 PM ET Sunday to 4:59 PM ET Friday (23 hours/day during market hours). 1-hour daily maintenance window where you can’t place trades.

No Overnight or Weekend Holds: All positions must be closed by 4:59 PM ET daily. If you hold through close, your account is disqualified immediately, no warnings, no appeals. This is strictly enforced.

Prohibited:

• High-frequency trading (HFT)
• Account sharing or letting others trade your account
• Hedging (holding long and short positions simultaneously)
• Manipulative practices (spoofing, layering, wash trading)

Allowed:

• News trading (with restrictions, no opposing positions during same event)
• Dollar-cost averaging (DCA) into positions
• Automated/semi-automated trading (bots, trade copiers)
• Scalping, day trading, swing trading (as long as closed EOD)

The Funded Stage (Performance Account): Where Apex Shows Its True Colors

Passing the evaluation unlocks your Performance Account (PA), the funded stage where you can request payouts. This is where Apex’s rules get complicated and controversial.

Funded Account Activation Fee

After passing eval, you pay an activation fee:

• Tradovate: $105/month (or $150-360 lifetime)
• Rithmic: $85/month (or $130-340 lifetime)

The lifetime fee is tempting but risky, if you blow the account in month 2, you’ve overpaid compared to monthly. Most traders start monthly and only convert to lifetime after proving consistency.

The Two 30% Rules (Funded Accounts)

This is where Apex gets infamous. There are two separate 30% rules that apply to funded accounts, and both can block payouts or lead to account termination.

30% Consistency Rule (Daily Profit Limit)

No single trading day’s profit can exceed 30% of your total profit since your last payout (or since account activation if you haven’t requested a payout yet).

Example:

• You’ve made $5,000 total profit since last payout
• Your next trading day generates $1,600 profit
• $1,600 / $5,000 = 32% → Consistency violation
• You cannot request a payout until you trade enough to dilute the percentage below 30%

The Reset: This rule resets after each approved payout. Once you get paid, your “total profit” counter starts from zero for the next cycle.

When It Stops: After your 6th payout, the consistency rule no longer applies. You can make 90% of profits in one day if you want. This is Apex’s way of saying “you’ve proven discipline, trade however you want.”

Why it’s controversial: News traders, breakout traders, and anyone with uneven profit patterns hate this rule. If you wait for perfect setups and capitalize hard, you’re punished for efficiency.

30% Negative P&L Rule (Intraday Loss Limit)

Your open trade losses cannot exceed 30% of your start-of-day profit balance on any single trade.

Example:

• You start the day with $3,000 in realized profit
• You enter a trade that goes against you
• If your unrealized loss hits $900 (30% of $3,000), you’re in violation
• Apex expects you to close or reduce the position immediately

For new accounts: If you haven’t built profit yet, the 30% rule applies to your trailing threshold. On a 50K account ($2,500 trailing threshold), you can’t have more than $750 in unrealized loss on a single trade.

Adjustment to 50%: Once your profit doubles your trailing threshold (e.g., $5,000 profit on a 50K account with $2,500 threshold), the rule adjusts to 50% instead of 30%. This gives more room as you prove profitability.

Why it’s controversial: This rule kills scalability for position traders. If you’re trading 10 ES contracts with a 10-point stop, you’re risking $500/point × 10 contracts = $5,000 potential loss. You’d need $16,667 in start-of-day profit just to place that trade under the 30% rule. For most traders, this caps position sizes far below the advertised contract limits.

The Safety Net Requirement (First 3 Payouts)

For your first three payouts, you must maintain a “safety net”, your account balance must stay above:

Safety Net = Trailing Threshold + $100

Example (50K account):

• Trailing threshold: $2,500
• Safety net: $52,600 ($50,000 starting balance + $2,500 + $100)
• If you want to withdraw $1,000, your balance must be at least $53,600 post-withdrawal

Minimum payout: $500 (can encroach into safety net by up to $500 on first payout)

After 3 payouts: The safety net requirement lifts, and you can withdraw more aggressively.

Why it exists: Apex wants to ensure you don’t immediately drain the account after passing evaluation. It forces you to build a cushion before large withdrawals.

Payout Requirements & Schedule

Minimum Trading Days Between Payouts: 8 trading days, with at least 5 days showing $50+ profit (updated in 2025 from older requirements)

Payout Window: Anytime once requirements met (as of late 2025/early 2026, Apex used to have fixed windows 1st-5th and 15th-20th of month)

Processing:

• Review & approval: 2 business days
• Fund transfer: 3-4 business days domestic, 3-7 international
• Payouts processed through Deel or Plane (depending on location)

Maximum Payouts:

• First 3 months: Limited based on account size and safety net
• After 3 months: No maximum (you can withdraw entire profit balance if above safety net)

Profit Split:

• 100% of first $25,000 in profits per account
• 90/10 split thereafter (you keep 90%, Apex takes 10%)

This profit structure is genuinely competitive, few firms offer 100% of first $25K. But remember, you’re paying monthly fees ($85-105 for Rithmic/Tradovate) that offset the generous split.

The 5:1 Risk-Reward Rule

All trades must maintain a maximum 5:1 risk-to-reward ratio. If you’re targeting 10 ticks profit, your stop loss can’t exceed 50 ticks.

Why this exists: To prevent traders from taking tiny gains with massive stops (a common blow-up pattern). Apex wants to see reasonable risk management.

How it’s enforced: Monitored via trade history. Occasional violations won’t kill your account, but consistent 10:1 or 20:1 risk-reward setups will get flagged and potentially lead to account closure.

The Contract Scaling Limit (Funded Accounts)

Even after passing eval and activating PA, you’re still limited to half contracts until you clear the trailing threshold on your funded account.

Example (50K PA):

• Contract limit: 80 micros
• Start funded: Can only trade 40 micros
• Unlock point: Close a day at $52,600+
• After unlock: Full 80 micros available

This means your first days/weeks on PA are still restricted. You need to prove profitability before accessing full position sizes.

Apex 3.0 Updates (Late 2024/Early 2025)

Apex rolled out significant rule changes in late 2024 (dubbed “Apex 3.0” by the community). Key updates:

What Got Easier:

• DCA (dollar-cost averaging) now allowed without restrictions
• Automated trading (bots) now permitted with active monitoring
• Bracket orders and opening orders no longer restricted
• No more fixed payout windows (request anytime)
• Flipping/scalping explicitly allowed

What Got Harder:

• Stricter enforcement of 30% rules (both consistency and negative P&L)
• More account closures for “erratic trading patterns”
• Probation system introduced for rule violations
• Enhanced monitoring via PA Charts (automated compliance tracking)

The net effect: Apex claims they’re loosening rules, but traders report more payout denials and account terminations than before. The automated compliance system flags behaviors that previously went unnoticed, leading to more friction.

Platform Quality & Execution

Rithmic Execution: Generally excellent. Low latency, reliable fills, professional-grade infrastructure. Most serious traders prefer Rithmic for its speed and stability.

Tradovate Execution: Good but not quite Rithmic-level. Occasional lag during high volatility (NFP, FOMC). Mobile app is solid for monitoring but not ideal for active trading.

WealthCharts: Too new to judge long-term reliability. Early reviews mention powerful scanning but occasional bugs. Platform is evolving rapidly.

Custom Apex Server: Apex uses its own Rithmic server instance, which historically has been stable. Execution complaints are rare compared to firms using shared servers.

Commission Structure:

• Rithmic: $0.84-5.58 per round-turn (varies by instrument)
• Tradovate: $0.60-4.64 per round-turn
• Micro contracts: $1.02-1.50 typical
• Mini contracts: $3.00-5.00 typical

Commissions are on the higher end of industry standard but not egregious. Some traders complain about “hidden” commissions eating into profits, but these are clearly disclosed.

The Payout Controversy: Why So Many Complaints?

Despite 15,000+ positive Trustpilot reviews, Apex has a persistent reputation for payout denials. Common complaints:

1. Consistency Rule Surprises: Traders request payouts and get denied because one day exceeded 30% of total profit. Apex’s dashboard doesn’t always clearly show compliance status, leading to surprise denials.

2. Retroactive Rule Changes: Apex has been accused of changing rules mid-cycle and applying them retroactively. Traders who were compliant under old rules suddenly find themselves in violation under new rules.

3. “Erratic Trading” Terminations: Apex’s automated system flags “erratic” trading patterns (changing contract sizes, switching instruments frequently, inconsistent strategy). Accounts get closed with vague explanations like “non-compliant trading behavior.”

4. Slow Support Responses: Despite Apex’s claims of 2-minute live chat, many traders report 48-72 hour ticket response times for payout issues. By the time support responds, the payout window has passed.

5. International Payout Delays: Non-US traders report significant delays and confusion with Deel/Plane payment setup. Some wait weeks for funds after approval.

Counter-perspective: Apex argues that most denials are legitimate, traders violated rules (often the 30% negative P&L rule without realizing it) or engaged in manipulative strategies. The firm claims they pay out anyone who follows rules properly.

My take: Both sides have valid points. Apex’s rules are complex enough that innocent violations happen frequently. But the firm also catches genuine rule-breakers who were hoping to slip through. The problem is lack of transparency, Apex’s compliance system is a black box, and traders don’t always understand why they were denied until after the fact.

Monthly Fees: The Real Cost of Apex

Let’s talk about what Apex actually costs over time.

Example: 50K Rithmic Account

• Evaluation: $187/month (with 80% discount, often available: $37)
• First attempt: Pass in month 1 → $37 spent
• Activation: $85/month
• Month 2-12: $85 × 11 = $935
• Total Year 1 cost: $1,057 (if you pass first try and stay funded)

Reality check: Most traders fail 2-3 evaluations before passing.

• 3 evaluation attempts: $187 + $80 (reset) + $80 (reset) = $347
• Activation: $85/month × 12 = $1,020
• Total Year 1 cost: $1,367 (more realistic scenario)

Lifetime Activation Option:

• 50K Rithmic lifetime: $130 one-time
• Saves money if you stay funded 2+ months
• But if you blow the account, you’ve lost the lifetime fee

Hidden costs:

• Commissions: $0.84-5.58 per round-turn (can add up to $500-1000/year for active traders)
• Professional data fees: If you select “Professional” trader status, add $115+/month exchange fees
• Reset fees: $80-100 each time you fail

Comparison to competitors:

• MyFundedFutures: $77-329/month (cheaper), $130 activation (similar), but 80/20 profit split (worse)
• DayTraders: $125-350 one-time (much cheaper), no monthly fees, 100% profit split (much better)
• TopStep: $165-325/month (similar), but 90/10 split and better reputation

Apex’s monthly fees are mid-range but add up over time. The activation fee is standard. Where Apex wins is the 100% of first $25K profit structure, if you’re profitable, that bonus offsets fees quickly.

Pass Rates & Success Statistics

Apex doesn’t publish official pass rates (no prop firm does, bad for marketing). Community estimates based on Discord/Reddit discussions:

Evaluation Pass Rate: ~15-20% (similar to industry average)

Funded Trader Success Rate: Unknown, but likely <5% of evaluation buyers reach consistent profitability on PA

Why so low? The trailing drawdown during eval kills most attempts. Even traders with profitable strategies blow accounts on reversals. The 30% rules during funding block payouts for many who pass eval. And the monthly fees drain accounts for marginally profitable traders.

Apex’s perspective: “We only want professional traders who can follow rules.” The low pass rate is intentional, it filters out undisciplined traders and ensures Apex isn’t over-leveraged on payout obligations.

Apex vs. The Competition

Apex vs. TopStep

TopStep advantages:

• More established (13+ years), better reputation
• More transparent rules, fewer sudden changes
• No trailing drawdown (uses static max loss)
• Better educational resources

Apex advantages:

• Cheaper monthly fees ($147 vs. $165+ at TopStep)
• Larger account sizes ($300K vs. $250K max)
• Can hold up to 20 accounts (vs. 3 at TopStep)
• 100% of first $25K (TopStep is 100% of first $5K, then 90/10)

Verdict: TopStep for stability and reputation. Apex for scale and cost.

Apex vs. MyFundedFutures

MFFU advantages:

• One-step eval, only 4 days minimum (vs. Apex’s 7)
• No trailing drawdown during eval (uses EOD trailing)
• No 30% negative P&L rule
• Faster payout approval (32 min avg vs. 2+ days)

Apex advantages:

• Larger account sizes ($300K vs. $150K max)
• 100% of first $25K (vs. MFFU’s 100% of first $10K, then 80/20)
• Can hold 20 accounts (vs. 5 at MFFU)
• More platform options

Verdict: MFFU for easier rules and faster payouts. Apex for maximum capital and scale.

Apex vs. DayTraders.com

DayTraders advantages:

• 100% profit split forever (vs. Apex’s 90/10 after $25K)
• No monthly fees once funded (vs. Apex’s $85-105/month)
• Automated payout approval in 32 min (vs. 2+ days)
• 45% pass rate (vs. Apex’s ~15-20%)

Apex advantages:

• More established (2021 vs. 2023 for DayTraders)
• Larger account sizes ($300K vs. $300K max at DayTraders, tie)
• Bigger community (15K+ reviews vs. 200+)
• More platform choices

Verdict: DayTraders for best economics if you’re profitable. Apex for established reputation and scale.

Apex vs. Take Profit Trader

TPT advantages:

• Lower monthly costs ($99 for 50K)
• Simpler rules (no 30% negative P&L rule)
• Faster minimum pass time (5 days)

Apex advantages:

• 100% of first $25K (TPT doesn’t have this bonus)
• Up to 20 accounts (vs. ~10 at TPT)
• Larger max account size ($300K vs. $250K)

Verdict: TPT for simplicity and lower cost. Apex for profit split bonus and scale.

The Red Flags: What Could Go Wrong

1. The Trailing Drawdown Is a Trap

Apex’s trailing drawdown during evaluation is designed to fail traders who let wins reverse. Even skilled traders blow accounts this way. The static account avoids this but has other limitations (2-contract max).

Mitigation: Take profits early and often during eval. Don’t let winners run, lock in gains. Use tight trailing stops once profitable.

2. The 30% Rules Are Profit Killers

Both 30% rules (consistency and negative P&L) block payouts and limit position sizes. News traders and breakout traders are at severe disadvantage.

Mitigation: Trade small, consistent size. Avoid “home run” trades during funded stage. Spread profits across multiple days.

3. Monthly Fees Compound Fast

At $85-105/month for funded accounts, you’re paying $1,000-1,260/year just to maintain access. If you’re marginally profitable ($500-1000/month), fees eat 30-50% of earnings.

Mitigation: Use lifetime activation if confident you’ll stay funded 3+ months. Or consider firms with no monthly fees (DayTraders, E2L programs).

4. Rule Changes Without Warning

Apex has changed rules multiple times (2022, 2023, 2024 “Apex 3.0”). Sometimes these changes disadvantage existing traders who were operating under old rules.

Mitigation: Read the support docs obsessively. Join Apex’s Discord to stay updated on rule changes. Don’t assume what worked last month still applies.

5. Payout Denials Are Common

Countless traders report surprise payout denials for “non-compliance” despite believing they followed all rules. Apex’s compliance system is opaque.

Mitigation: Screenshot your trades, document your strategy, keep detailed logs. If denied, fight with evidence. Some traders win appeals.

6. Customer Support Is Hit-or-Miss

Despite 4.4+ Trustpilot, many traders report slow support responses (48-72 hours) for critical issues like payout denials or account access problems.

Mitigation: Use live chat for urgent issues (avoid tickets). Escalate on Discord if not getting responses. Join the community, other traders often help faster than support.

My Honest Take: Is Apex Worth It?

After analyzing everything, the rules, the costs, the reviews, the controversies, here’s my genuine assessment.

Apex Trader Funding is legitimate. They’ve paid out $378+ million, funded thousands of traders, and operate transparently enough to build a 15,000+ review Trustpilot profile. This isn’t a scam.

But Apex is optimized for Apex’s profitability, not yours. The business model depends on:

• High evaluation volume (most fail)
• Reset fees ($80-100 per failure)
• Monthly fees ($137-677 during eval, $85-105 after funding)
• Profit splits (10% of anything above $25K)

Apex makes money whether you succeed or fail. But they make more money from failures (evaluation fees, resets) than from successful traders (10% of profits). This creates a structural misalignment of incentives.

The 100% of first $25K is real and valuable. If you’re a profitable trader, this bonus alone makes Apex competitive. On a 50K account, $25K in profit = $25K to you vs. $22.5K at a 90/10 firm. That $2.5K difference is meaningful.

The trailing drawdown is brutal. More traders fail Apex’s eval due to trailing drawdown reversals than any other single factor. You can trade perfectly, build profit, then have one bad reversal that wipes you out despite still being above starting balance.

The 30% rules are controversial for good reason. The consistency rule punishes efficient traders who make uneven profits. The negative P&L rule caps position sizes below advertised limits. Both rules block payouts regularly.

Monthly fees are expensive at scale. If you’re running 5x 50K Rithmic accounts, that’s $425/month in activation fees alone. Over a year, $5,100 just to maintain access. You need significant profitability to justify those costs.

Apex’s community is massive but divided. Some traders love Apex (usually those who passed quickly and get consistent payouts). Others despise it (usually those who failed multiple evals or got payout denials). The truth is Apex works if you fit their rules, but many traders don’t.

Customer support is inconsistent. Some traders report amazing experiences (2-minute chat responses, helpful agents). Others report nightmare scenarios (72-hour ticket delays, vague denial explanations, accounts closed without clear reason). Seems support quality depends on which agent you get.

The platform execution is solid. Rithmic is professional-grade. Tradovate is accessible. WealthCharts is promising. Apex’s server infrastructure is stable. You’re not getting screwed on fills or platform quality, the issues are rules, not technology.

Who Should Use Apex?

Apex is great for:

• Scalpers and day traders who close all positions daily (no overnight issues)
• Disciplined traders who can follow complex rules without violation
• Traders seeking maximum capital (up to $300K accounts, 20 accounts simultaneously)
• Profit-focused traders (100% of first $25K is genuinely valuable)
• Traders comfortable with trailing drawdowns (or willing to use static account)
• Volume traders who want to scale multiple accounts

Apex is NOT ideal for:

• News traders (30% consistency rule punishes big winning days)
• Position traders (30% negative P&L rule limits position sizes)
• Swing traders (can’t hold overnight, severely limiting strategy)
• Rule-averse traders (too many rules to track, easy to violate unknowingly)
• Cost-sensitive traders ($137-677/month adds up fast)
• Beginners (trailing drawdown will eat you alive without experience)

The Bottom Line

Apex Trader Funding is the McDonald’s of prop firms, massive, ubiquitous, aggressively marketed, and polarizing. Some people love it (convenient, reliable, delivers what it promises). Others hate it (feels corporate, quality inconsistent, optimized for profit not experience).

The firm offers genuine value: large capital access, competitive profit splits, professional platforms, and a proven payout track record. But it also has genuine problems: complex rules, expensive fees, trailing drawdown traps, inconsistent support, and a business model that profits from your failures.

If you’re a disciplined, experienced futures trader who can navigate Apex’s rule maze and pay the monthly fees, the 100% of first $25K makes it worthwhile. You’ll likely get funded, get paid, and potentially scale to 10-20 accounts generating real income.

If you’re newer to trading, hate complex rules, or trade strategies that conflict with Apex’s structure (news trading, swing trading, big position sizes), you’ll probably fail multiple evaluations, spend hundreds on resets, and never reach profitability on the platform.

Apex isn’t for everyone. But for the right trader, it’s a legitimate path to funded futures trading.

Start with a single 50K Rithmic account (cheapest option, best execution). If you fail, decide whether the $80 reset and rule complexity are worth it, or if you’d be better served at a simpler firm (MyFundedFutures, DayTraders, Take Profit Trader).

Final Score: 3.8/5 Stars

Apex earns points for scale (up to $300K, 20 accounts), profit split (100% of first $25K), platform quality (Rithmic/Tradovate/WealthCharts), and proven payouts ($378M+). It loses points for trailing drawdown brutality, 30% rule complexity, high monthly fees, inconsistent support, and a business model that profits from trader failure. For experienced, disciplined futures traders, it’s a solid choice. For everyone else, proceed with extreme caution.

---

Quick Reference: Apex Trader Funding At a Glance

Founded: 2021 (Austin, Texas, founded by Darrell Martin)

Account Types:

• Tradovate: $167-677/month, web-based, TradingView integration
• Rithmic: $147-657/month, professional-grade, NinjaTrader included
• WealthCharts: Similar to Rithmic, exclusive scanners/alerts
• Static 100K: $137/month, fixed drawdown, limited to 2 contracts

Evaluation:

• One-step challenge, no time limit
• 7 trading days minimum
• 6% profit target (varies by account)
• Trailing drawdown (or static on 100K account)
• Contract scaling (half contracts until unlock)
• No overnight holds, all positions closed by 4:59 PM ET

Profit Split:

• 100% of first $25,000 in profits per account
• 90/10 thereafter (you keep 90%, Apex takes 10%)

Payouts:

• 8 trading days between payouts (5 days with $50+ profit)
• Request anytime once qualified (as of late 2024)
• Processing: 2 days review + 3-4 days transfer (domestic)
• Minimum payout: $500
• No maximum after 3 months

Funded Rules:

• 30% Consistency Rule: No day >30% of total profit (until 6th payout)
• 30% Negative P&L Rule: Open losses can’t exceed 30% of start-of-day profit
• Safety Net: First 3 payouts require balance > trailing threshold + $100
• 5:1 Risk-Reward: Max 5:1 ratio on all trades
• Scaling: Still trade half contracts until unlock on funded account

Fees:

• Evaluation: $137-677/month (discounts up to 90% common)
• Reset: $80 (Rithmic), $100 (Tradovate)
• Activation: $85/month Rithmic ($130-340 lifetime), $105/month Tradovate ($150-360 lifetime)
• Commissions: $0.84-5.58 per round-turn

Account Limits:

• Up to 20 funded accounts simultaneously
• Up to $6 million in total capital (20 × $300K)

Platforms: Rithmic, Tradovate, WealthCharts, NinjaTrader, TradingView, Sierra Chart, others

Instruments: All CME Group futures (indices, commodities, currencies, rates, crypto futures)

Trustpilot: 4.4-4.8/5 stars, 15,000+ reviews

Website Traffic: 2.7 million monthly visitors (5th among prop firms)

Reported Payouts: $378+ million (as of January 2025)

Best For: Disciplined day traders, scalpers, capital seekers, rule-followers

Not Ideal For: News traders, swing traders, position traders, beginners, rule-averse traders

Unique Selling Points:

• 100% of first $25K in profits (best in industry)
• Up to 20 funded accounts (most among prop firms)
• Accounts up to $300K (tied for largest with DayTraders)
• Frequent 80-90% discount sales

Biggest Weaknesses:

• Trailing drawdown kills most evaluation attempts
• 30% rules (consistency + negative P&L) block payouts regularly
• Monthly fees expensive at scale
• Rule changes without warning
• Payout denials common for “non-compliance”